Advertising disclosure

This site is paid for by one broker. FxPro pays the desk a commission when a reader opens an account through our link, and that is the entire revenue of the project. We state it on every page rather than in a footnote, because a reader who learns it late is entitled to distrust everything they read before.

Last reviewed 11 October 2026

What the money buys

It buys placement and attention: a labelled card under our paying broker's row in the cost table, a button in the header, and links at the end of the long pages. All of it is marked as sponsored and all of it carries the markup that tells a search engine the same thing.

It does not buy a number. FxPro is measured on the same instrument, in the same window, on the same class of account as every other broker here, by the same code, with the same feed audit applied to its series. It does not buy a position either: the cost table is sorted by annual cost and our paying broker sits wherever that sort puts it — currently not at the top. It does not buy silence: where it loses, the loss is printed in the same type size as a win, and the head-to-head pages exist specifically so that each comparison can be read on its own.

The deal, stated plainly

Who paysFxPro only. One broker, one link, labelled Sponsored.

What is paid forA commission when a reader opens an account through our link.

What is not for saleA figure, a ranking position, the removal of a loss, or the removal of a competitor from the table.

The other brokersMeasured and named, and not linked at all. We have no relationship with them and we do not pretend to one by sending you there.

If a figure embarrasses the sponsorIt is published. The headline on the front page is the sponsor's own cost ranking, and it is not flattering.

Why this arrangement and not another

A measurement desk costs money to run: accounts, hardware that stays awake, a machine per broker platform, and the time that goes into auditing feeds and chasing register entries. The honest options are a subscription, advertising, or affiliate commission. We took the third, with one broker rather than a rotating carousel, because a single stated relationship can be audited by a reader in a minute — you know exactly who pays, you can see exactly where they rank, and you can check our figure for them against anybody else's.

The structural risk of that model is obvious and we would rather name it than be caught with it: we are paid more when readers open accounts at one particular broker, which is a reason to shade a measurement in its favour. The defences are in the method — the same code for every broker, the feed audit that has already disqualified our own sponsor's series, a figure's source class printed at the figure, and a published window so any reader can measure the same thing and contradict us. If this site ever stops printing its sponsor's losses, that is the moment to stop believing it.

Links to our sponsor carry rel="sponsored nofollow" and open in a new tab. We do not use the sponsor's brand in a way that implies they endorse this site, and they have no editorial input, no preview of our figures, and no veto.

Nothing here is advice. Trading leveraged products carries risk and you can lose money. Our measurements describe a past window on our own accounts.